News, sports, politics, blogs and forums for Hutchinson, Minnnesota • (320) 587-5000

MotorbuysReal EstatemyMarketplace.mnCoupons

Advertising

Advertising

EDITORIAL: Do you know where your children are?


» Read similar stories filed under:

Not so long ago — well, long enough that only those of us over 40 remember it — TV stations would run a public service announcement following their 10 o’clock news. The message was brief and to the point: “Parents, it’s 10:30. Do you know where your children are?”

TV stations don’t run that message anymore, perhaps because they figure it’s more important to tell us viewers about the guests on Letterman or O’Brien than to remind us of our parental responsibilities. That’s OK — we shouldn’t have to be told this, anyway.

All the same, we’re thankful that the McLeod County Board of Commissioners has decided to remind parents to know where their children are.

The county has adopted a curfew ordinance. It’s not yet in effect. First, a public hearing must take place —that’s set for Nov. 3.
We have no doubt it will help law enforcement officials, especially sheriff’s deputies patrolling rural areas, who meet up with young people who should be at home. Most cities in McLeod County already have curfews, so this new ordinance will only affect rural areas outside city limits.

Under the ordinance, minors will not be allowed in public areas or on business’ premises without a parent or guardian during the following hours:

< children 13 or younger, between 9 p.m. and 6 a.m.,
< children 15 or younger, between 10 p.m and 6 a.m.,
< children 16 or younger, between 11 p.m. and 6 a.m.,
< and children 17 or younger, between midnight and 6 a.m.
Several exceptions will apply, including:
< children on the job, or heading to and from it,
< children attending an officially sponsored school, religious or other recreational activity supervised by adults,
< children on an errand at the behest of their parents or guardians, without making any detours or stops,
< and several other conditions.

Parents who are concerned about their children’s best interests already are abiding by the curfew, simply by using common sense. Parents who care about their kids have rules that keep their children out of trouble and safe at home.

Those who don’t are either too busy or don’t care. Either way, it’s a sad commentary on society when our county must take on this parental role — but we’re glad the County Board is doing it.

Advertisement. Article continues below.

Curfews are good for several reasons:

< Curfews help prevent gang activities.
< Curfews save children’s lives by forcing them to stay inside where they are safe.
< Police can more easily find missing and runaway children when curfews keep all the other kids at home.
< Many kids already don’t get enough sleep, so having them at home is one step closer to getting them to bed on time.

These are only a few of many reasons why children need a curfew.

We think it’s a good thing.

(Editorials are written by Publisher Matt McMillan and Editor Doug Hanneman. They can be reached at mcmillan@hutchinsonleader.com, or hanneman@hutchinsonleader.com.)




So I'm just curious...would...

Back to page top

So I'm just curious...would a 17 year old be breaking curfew if they were at a friends house watching a movie or just hanging out and they drove directly home at let's say 1 am? My kids are beyond that age now by a few years but when they were in 12th grade, we were fine with them being at a friends house on a Friday or Saturday night until 1 or 2am. We knew their friends and their parents and didn't have a problem with it.


Submitted by dragonflylady on October 27, 2009 - 8:13am.

Judging by the proposed...

Back to page top

Judging by the proposed ordinance language (viewable on the County's Web site by clicking here), it would appear a 17-year-old in that hypothetical scenario would be technically breaking curfew.

There are some exceptions to curfew, listed under paragraph III (A) as follows:


II. EXCEPTIONS

A. The following shall constitute valid exception to the operation of the curfew. That the minor was:

1. accompanied by the minor’s parent or guardian;

2. on an errand at the direction of the minor’s parent or guardian, without any detour or stop;

3. in a motor vehicle involved in interstate travel;

4. engaged in employment activity, or going to or returning home from an employment activity, without any detour or stop;

5. involved in an emergency;

6. on the sidewalk abutting the minor’s residence or abutting the residence of a next-door neighbor if the neighbor did not complain to the Sheriff’s Office about the minor’s presence;

7. attending an official school, religious, or other recreational activity supervised by adults and sponsored by the County of McLeod, a civic organization, or another similar entity that takes responsibility for the minor, or going to or returning home from, without any detour or stop, an official school, religious, or other recreational activity supervised by adults and sponsored by the County of McLeod, a civic organization, or another similar entity that take responsibility for the minor;

8. exercising First Amendment rights protected by the United States Constitution, such as the free exercise of religious, freedom of speech, and the right of assembly; or

9. married or has been married.

I'm not an attorney, so take this with a fistful of salt, but I notice there's no definition under the "DEFINITIONS" section of the ordinance of what constitutes an "errand." I imagine you, as a parent, could claim it's an "errand" when you direct your kid to go watch a movie at a friend's house and return "without any detour or stop."

I don't know if that argument would hold water in court, but I suspect it's not the intent of this ordinance to make life hard for responsible, well-behaved 17-year-olds partaking in legal and parentally sanctioned weekend movie nights.

(Jorge Sosa is a staff writer for the Hutchinson Leader. He can be reached at sosa@hutchinsonleader.com)


Submitted by Jorge Sosa on October 27, 2009 - 10:40am.

Dragonflylady, I spoke with...

Back to page top

Dragonflylady, I spoke with Sheriff Scott Rehmann and confirmed the spirit of the proposed curfew ordinance is not to crack down on well-behaved kids having a weekend movie night or the like.

In a situation like the one you mentioned, Rehmann said, "They would be fine if they're going straight home." If they're found tooling around in the country at 2 or 3 a.m., that's a different story.

The main concern is curtailing activities by minors who might be out until the wee hours in rural areas, drinking, causing trouble, etc.

(Jorge Sosa is a staff writer for the Hutchinson Leader. He can be reached at sosa@hutchinsonleader.com)


Submitted by Jorge Sosa on October 27, 2009 - 11:56am.

Jorge, Thanks for checking...

Back to page top

Jorge, Thanks for checking that out. Like I said, my kids are beyond that age, but there are many good kids in this area that are in that age group and I was hoping that this wouldn't affect them hanging out at friends houses, etc.


Submitted by dragonflylady on October 27, 2009 - 1:38pm.

I see there are already...

Back to page top

I see there are already exceptions to this rule. If the cops see a "good kid" on the streets past curfew, no problem. If they see a "problem child" there may be an issue.

So if a kid says he was on his way home going in a homes direction, I assumed they would let you go? Even though they just got done stealing a bike from the nursing home?

Either they cshould enforce it of leave it alone. I don't agree with it at all.


Submitted by B@ssDoctor on October 27, 2009 - 2:22pm.

For it what it's worth, the...

Back to page top

For it what it's worth, the city of Hutchinson's existing curfew ordinance contains a very similar set of exceptions.

One main difference I see is the county's proposed ordinance adds a separate exception for minors "involved in an emergency." Also, while the county ordinance makes an exception for minors "on an errand at the direction of the minor’s parent or guardian, without any detour or stop," the city's corresponding exception seems stricter:

The provisions of this section shall not apply .... to a minor who is upon an emergency errand at the direction of his or her parent, guardian or other adult person having the primary care and custody of the minor ...

An emergency errand is defined in the ordinance as:

A task that if not completed promptly threatens the health, safety or comfort of the minor or a member of the minor’s household. The term shall include, but shall not be limited to, seeking urgent medical treatment, seeking urgent assistance from law enforcement or fire department personnel and seeking shelter from the elements or urgent assistance from a utility company due to a natural or human-made calamity.

(Jorge Sosa is a staff writer for the Hutchinson Leader. He can be reached at sosa@hutchinsonleader.com)


Submitted by Jorge Sosa on October 27, 2009 - 3:42pm.

Moral of the story? If...

Back to page top

Moral of the story? If you're out late at night, remember these simple words: "I am on my way home, officer." It's all good.


Submitted by jollyjoker on October 27, 2009 - 10:55pm.

Hopefully when this passes...

Back to page top

Hopefully when this passes the county will have to deal with less vandalism such as mailboxes being smashed, road signs being shot, and fields being driven through. Judging by the Sheriff's report in the McLeod County Chronicle that seems to be an every weekend event. Can't imagine that giving cops the right to stop a car load of juveniles cruising on the backroads at "O dark thirty" will curb these events at all. I imagine this will also cut down on underage drinking in this county as well. Believe it or not even the "good" kids drink when they are underage. And even the "good" kids then get behind the wheel and drive. And even the "good" kids get in crashes. And when they do we all blame system for not being stricter. In the end I think this ordinance will save a lot of taxpayer money because we won't have to be footing the bill on fixing road signs and all the vandalism that occurs past the hours of curfew. It also should eventually lead to a small drop in crashes which saves us all money on insurance in the long run.


Submitted by Wildfan on October 27, 2009 - 2:56pm.

Of course they don't!! If...

Back to page top

Of course they don't!! If parents knew where their kids were at all times Big Brother wouldn't have to make a law to guarantee it. If parents would do their job and parent, know who their kids are with, make sure they are home the same day they left, CARE, we could all sleep better at night. The world is a much more dangerous place than it has ever been, but instead of reigning our kids in we let them stay out, roaming aimlessly, getting into mischief, like never before. Standards are not a bad thing "parents". If you need a government entity to tell you what is safe for your children, you should never have become a parent. You aren't qualified.


Submitted by arcy on October 27, 2009 - 5:11pm.

curfews have been around...

Back to page top

curfews have been around since what the late forties and early fifties? I have no problem with a curfew, my daughter how ever does lol. God mom it is so fifties having a curfew. I said it is in place so that you kids do not get into any mischief.She said she hardly did hahaha. With the vandalisms happening, it is good to have it because then we as parents know where our children are after 9 at night and 100 am if they are 17.


Submitted by justlisahere on October 28, 2009 - 3:15pm.

Parents should also know...

Back to page top

Parents should also know where their kids are before the curfew times. Know where they are, who they are with and what they are doing.


Submitted by bosoxguy on October 29, 2009 - 9:04am.

Absolutely! Kids can get...

Back to page top

Absolutely! Kids can get into just as much trouble before curfew as they can after curfew.


Submitted by dragonflylady on October 29, 2009 - 9:43am.

Advertising

Advertising

Recent comments

Advertising

Advertising

Who's new

  • Moffitt
  • LeonnaL
  • TiffannieD
  • drivesafely
  • grandma

Who's online

There are currently 2 users and 434 guests online.

Online users

  • Terry Davis
  • williamj.lepetomane

Today's Poll


» Read similar stories filed under:


Advertising